AI Insight
Researchers used transcranial direct current stimulation to identify distinct brain regions responsible for distinguishing real memories from imagined ones. In a study of 100 participants, stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhanced the ability to distinguish between self-generated and other-generated memories, particularly for spoken information, while stimulation of the temporoparietal junction reduced the ability to distinguish between perceived and imagined events. The findings reveal that these two brain regions make separate, dissociable contributions to different aspects of memory monitoring.
Why it matters
Understanding how the brain distinguishes real memories from imagination could have important applications for treating conditions involving memory distortions, such as false memories in eyewitness testimony, confabulation in neurological patients, or intrusive thoughts in psychiatric disorders. The identification of specific brain targets may also inform future therapeutic interventions using brain stimulation techniques.
Understand the Science
⚠️ Preprint – Noch nicht peer-reviewed
Dieser Artikel wurde noch nicht von unabhängigen Experten begutachtet. Die Ergebnisse sind vorläufig und sollten mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.
Source and reality monitoring enable individuals to distinguish the origins of remembered information, including whether information was self- or other-generated and whether it was perceived or imagined. Although the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and temporoparietal junction (TPJ) have been implicated in these processes, their independent causal contributions remain unclear. We investigated whether focal transcranial direct current stimulation (f-tDCS) of the left dlPFC and left TPJ differentially modulates source and reality monitoring. One hundred participants were randomly assigned to receive anodal or sham stimulation of the left dlPFC or TPJ before completing an episodic memory task manipulating agent (self, experimenter), context (spoken, imagined), and emotional valence (positive, negative). Discrimination sensitivity (d’) and response criterion (c) were examined separately. For source monitoring, stimulation interacted with context and cortical region: anodal dlPFC stimulation was associated with a greater spoken-imagined difference in self-experimenter discrimination than sham stimulation, whereas no equivalent context-dependent effect emerged following TPJ stimulation. For reality monitoring, stimulation effects also differed by cortical target, with reduced spoken-imagined discrimination following anodal relative to sham TPJ stimulation and no significant effect of dlPFC stimulation. These effects were not accompanied by corresponding stimulation effects on response criterion. Independent of stimulation, source discrimination was substantially greater for spoken than imagined information, while reality-monitoring sensitivity was enhanced for self-generated relative to experimenter-generated negative information. Together, these findings provide evidence that the dlPFC and TPJ make dissociable contributions to source and reality monitoring, while highlighting the importance of contextual and affective features in determining how the origins of memories are evaluated.