AI Insight
This mixed-methods study examined barriers to sexual and reproductive health services among Ethiopian youth aged 18-24 in Guraghe Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Despite strong interest in sexual and reproductive health information, youth delayed seeking help due to discomfort, social pressure, and secrecy. Service utilization was limited by multiple barriers including distance, inconvenient hours, lack of privacy, perceived judgmental attitudes from healthcare providers, and financial constraints.
Why it matters
The findings highlight critical gaps between youth sexual and reproductive health needs and service accessibility in Sub-Saharan Africa, where youth comprise a significant population segment. The study provides evidence for targeted interventions including multi-channel education, decentralized services, and training healthcare workers to provide non-judgmental, confidential care to improve youth health outcomes.
Understand the Science
⚠️ Preprint – Noch nicht peer-reviewed
Dieser Artikel wurde noch nicht von unabhängigen Experten begutachtet. Die Ergebnisse sind vorläufig und sollten mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.
Background: Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is essential for youth development, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa where youth represent a significant proportion of the population. Despite global efforts to promote Sexual and Reproductive Health rights, many disadvantaged youths face barriers to accessing comprehensive information and services. Youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health (YFSRH) services are central to improving youth health outcomes. Despite national standards in Ethiopia, implementation challenges persist. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are key actors in promoting and delivering YFSRH services Method: A concurrent mixed-methods design was employed among youth (18-24 years) and health care workers in Guraghe Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Quantitative data were collected using self-administered questionnaires, while qualitative data were gathered through key informant interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 29, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Result: Although youths showed strong interest in Sexual and Reproductive Health information, help-seeking was often delayed due to discomfort, secrecy, social pressure, and limited foresight. Utilization of youth-friendly Sexual and Reproductive Health services was constrained by distance, inconvenient service hours, limited privacy and confidentiality, perceived judgmental provider attitudes, and financial barriers, reducing trust and repeat use. Conclusion: Improving youth Sexual and Reproductive Health requires integrated actions across education, families, and health services. Strengthening multi-channel Sexual and Reproductive Health education with life skills and psychosocial support, alongside decentralized, affordable, confidential, and non-judgmental youth-friendly services, is essential.