AI Insight
This study used integrated transcriptomic analysis to identify molecular biomarkers that distinguish chronic kidney disease (CKD) from end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Researchers identified three key genes—EPB42, KLF1, and H3F3A—with distinct expression patterns across disease stages, validated through multiple datasets and clinical blood samples. Notably, EPB42 showed decreased expression in CKD but increased expression in ESRD, suggesting its potential utility in differentiating disease stages.
Why it matters
These stage-specific biomarkers could improve diagnosis and prognosis for kidney disease patients, potentially enabling earlier detection of progression to ESRD. The identification of distinct molecular signatures may also inform targeted therapeutic strategies and help clinicians better monitor disease trajectory.
Understand the Science
⚠️ Preprint – Noch nicht peer-reviewed
Dieser Artikel wurde noch nicht von unabhängigen Experten begutachtet. Die Ergebnisse sind vorläufig und sollten mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) may progress to stage 5 CKD (end-stage renal disease, ESRD), but stage-associated molecular alterations remain incompletely characterized. This study aimed to identify candidate biomarkers associated with CKD and ESRD. Methods: Two discovery datasets comparing CKD or ESRD with healthy controls were analyzed using differential expression analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Candidate genes were identified by intersecting differentially expressed genes with key co-expression modules, followed by protein-protein interaction network analysis using Degree, Closeness, and Maximal Clique Centrality algorithms. Candidate genes were evaluated in independent GEO validation datasets and further examined by quantitative real-time PCR and western blotting using clinical blood samples. Results: Ten hub genes were identified, among which EPB42, KLF1, and H3F3A were prioritized for further evaluation. EPB42 showed decreased expression in CKD but increased expression in ESRD, indicating an opposite-direction pattern between the two disease states. KLF1 showed no significant difference between healthy controls and CKD but was increased in ESRD, whereas H3F3A was increased in CKD and further increased in ESRD. Functional enrichment analysis highlighted processes related to oxygen transport, mitochondrial function, muscle-associated processes, and inflammation, suggesting possible involvement of hypoxia-associated oxidative injury and ferroptosis-related processes. Conclusions: Integrated transcriptomic and experimental analyses identified EPB42, KLF1, and H3F3A as candidate stage-associated biomarkers in CKD and ESRD. In particular, the opposite-direction expression pattern of EPB42 may provide additional molecular information for distinguishing CKD from ESRD.