⚠️ Preprint – Noch nicht peer-reviewed
Dieser Artikel wurde noch nicht von unabhängigen Experten begutachtet. Die Ergebnisse sind vorläufig und sollten mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.
Background: While growing enthusiasm for the therapeutic potential of classic psychedelics has led to a rise in non-clinical use, attention to persisting adverse effects has emerged with delay. A subset of individuals reports persisting complications such as hallucinogen persisting perception disorder (HPPD), depersonalization/derealization disorder (DDD), anxiety and depression. Yet few medical services are equipped to address these complications. Aims: This qualitative study examines how societal, medical, and media discourses shape the experiences of individuals with persisting psychedelic-related complications, focusing on help-seeking trajectories. Methods: Thirteen semi-structured interviews with adults experiencing persisting psychedelic-related psychological symptoms (four women, nine men, age 19-49 years; HPPD (n = 10), DDD (n = 6), depression (n = 1), and anxiety (n = 1)) were conducted within a larger study on these complications. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Reporting followed the COREQ guidelines. Results: Three interrelated themes emerged: (1) The dissonance between expectation and harm – idealised media and scientific portrayals of psychedelics shaped initial use and complicated recognition of adverse outcomes; (2) Stigma, silence, and self-blame – prohibitionist discourse and internalised shame significantly inhibited help-seeking; and (3) Between systemic absence and self-organised support – participants encountered clinical unpreparedness and epistemic dismissal, which often led them to rely on online peer communities and self-management strategies. Positive clinical encounters, characterised by professional expertise and nonjudgmental engagement, were experienced as helpful. Conclusions: Adequate clinical and conceptual frameworks for persisting psychedelic-related complications are lacking. An interdisciplinary, experience-informed approach integrating realistic risk communication, clinician training, and destigmatisation is required to support affected individuals.