AI Insight
This study compared two treatment regimens for erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL), a severe immune complication of leprosy, in 61 patients followed for 6 months. Patients receiving prednisolone plus thalidomide showed significantly lower relapse rates (36.7% vs 71.0%), better steroid-sparing outcomes (93.3% vs 58.1% steroid-free at 6 months), and more sustained disease control compared to those receiving prednisolone plus tofacitinib. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio emerged as a useful biomarker, correlating with both disease severity and quality of life measures.
Why it matters
This research provides evidence that thalidomide remains more effective than tofacitinib for preventing relapses in severe leprosy reactions, which is important for treatment planning in endemic regions. The identification of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a monitoring biomarker could enable more objective disease tracking without specialized testing infrastructure.
Understand the Science
⚠️ Preprint – Noch nicht peer-reviewed
Dieser Artikel wurde noch nicht von unabhängigen Experten begutachtet. Die Ergebnisse sind vorläufig und sollten mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.
Background Erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) is a severe immune-mediated complication of multibacillary leprosy requiring prolonged immunosuppression. Steroid-sparing agents are essential to reduce relapse and treatment-related morbidity. Methods This longitudinal analytical observational study compared outcomes in patients with ENL treated with prednisolone plus thalidomide (Group A; n=30) and prednisolone plus tofacitinib (Group B; n=31). Patients were followed for 6 months. Primary outcomes included relapse rate and ENLIST ENL Severity Score (EESS). Secondary outcomes were neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), steroid dependency, and adverse events. Inter-group comparisons and longitudinal analyses were performed using non-parametric tests. Correlations between NLR, EESS, and DLQI were assessed using Spearmans rank correlation. Results Relapse occurred in 36.7% of patients in Group A and 71.0% in Group B (p=0.007). The mean number of relapses was significantly lower in Group A (0.70{+/-}1.06 vs 1.84{+/-}1.51, p=0.002). At 3 and 6 months, Group A demonstrated significantly lower NLR values (p=0.017 and p<0.001, respectively). DLQI and EESS scores improved in both groups; however, sustained improvement was more consistent in Group A. Steroid-free status at 6 months was achieved in 93.3% of Group A compared with 58.1% of Group B (p<0.001). NLR showed a positive correlation with EESS ({rho}=0.269, p=0.018) and DLQI ({rho}=0.604, p<0.001) at 6 months. On multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for baseline confounders, patients receiving tofacitinib had significantly higher odds of relapse compared with those receiving thalidomide (adjusted OR 9.87, 95% CI 1.73-27.12; p = 0.006).Adverse events were predominantly mild to moderate, with differing safety profiles between groups. Conclusion Thalidomide demonstrated superior relapse prevention and steroid-sparing efficacy compared with tofacitinib in ENL. NLR correlated with disease severity and quality of life, supporting its role as a useful biomarker for monitoring disease activity during follow-up.