Interdisciplinary

Why environmental treaties must also address mental health

How the science connects

Climate changeMental healthEnvironmental policy

AI Insight

This article argues that major international environmental treaties have largely failed to incorporate the mental health and psychosocial consequences of environmental crises including climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. The author advocates for explicitly integrating mental health considerations into global environmental conventions and policy frameworks. The piece outlines specific mechanisms through which environmental degradation affects psychological well-being and proposes actionable steps for addressing this gap in current environmental governance.


Recognition of mental health impacts in environmental policy could lead to more comprehensive and effective responses to global environmental challenges. Integrating psychological and social dimensions into treaties would better support affected populations and potentially strengthen public engagement with environmental protection measures.


Nature, Published online: 10 August 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-02450-3

Global conventions have mainly overlooked the psychological and social impacts of climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution. Here’s how to change that.

Source: Why environmental treaties must also address mental health