Interdisciplinary

Wind Works: The Atmosphere’s Invisible Energetic Tug-of-War

How the science connects

Climate changeAtmospheric circul…Radiative transfer

AI Insight

Researchers have developed a simplified model to predict how winds respond to global warming using just two factors: height-weighted radiative energy loss and the bulk Bowen ratio (the ratio of sensible to latent heat flux). They found that increased radiative cooling in the upper troposphere strengthens wind generation, while decreased Bowen ratio weakens it, and under current conditions these effects largely cancel each other out, explaining why climate models show minimal changes in global wind energy. However, this global balance masks significant regional changes, with storm tracks shifting poleward and the cancellation effect breaking down in extreme climates like snowball Earth scenarios.


Understanding wind response to climate change is essential for accurate climate modeling, assessing risks to infrastructure, and estimating future wind power capacity. The simplified model could also help scientists estimate atmospheric circulation on exoplanets where detailed data is unavailable.


Understand the Science

Climate change 129 articles Explore Concept → Atmospheric circulation Concept coming soon Radiative transfer Concept coming soon
A red and white windsock blows in the wind against a blue sky with white clouds.
Source: AGU Advances

Understanding how wind changes in response to global warming is necessary for accurately modeling climate and weather, identifying risks to infrastructure, and assessing global wind power capacity.

Sunlight delivers energy to Earth. A small part of that energy is converted into atmospheric kinetic energy (i.e., winds), which eventually dissipates into heat and radiates back out to space.

This heat exchange process is called the “atmospheric heat engine.” But traditional models of this engine depend on complex processes such as cloud microphysics that remain poorly constrained, limiting the models’ predictive power.

One of the main questions about wind and climate change is why models and observationally constrained reanalysis exhibit only relatively weak and inconsistent changes in the atmospheric heat engine in response to warming. Researchers also debate whether a wetter atmosphere is decreasing the efficiency of the heat engine, weakening global wind energy dissipation.

Jansen et al. present a new approach to estimating the work that drives the winds, using just two quantities. The first is the height-weighted radiative energy loss of the atmosphere. The second is a bulk Bowen ratio—the ratio of the column-integrated upward sensible heat flux to latent heat flux, which reflects how much energy travels upward as warm air versus latent heat in the form of water vapor.

The study authors worked from first principles to show how those two factors (the height-weighted radiative energy loss and the bulk Bowen ration) can explain changes in the heat engine and wind dissipation in various climate scenarios, including today’s.

They found that increases in radiative cooling in the upper troposphere and a decrease in bulk Bowen ratio with warming are in competition with each other. More radiative cooling increases the atmospheric heat engine’s work output, whereas a decrease in the bulk Bowen ratio reduces that output.

The balance between the two determines changes in the atmosphere’s kinetic energy dissipation and shapes how wind responds to a warming world.

Under current climate conditions, these opposing mechanisms largely cancel each other out, the study found. That could explain the relatively weak and inconsistent changes in global wind energy dissipation during the 21st century predicted in comprehensive climate models and atmospheric reanalysis.

However, the authors note that near-constant global wind energy dissipation does not imply that the winds don’t change at all. Climate change can still lead to significant shifts in atmospheric circulation and in regional wind behavior. The authors’ own simulations show the storm tracks shifting poleward, with substantial regional wind changes.

The authors also applied their theory across a much wider range of climates and found that this near cancellation breaks down at the extremes. In very cold climates, the energy driving the winds drops sharply—consistent with the far less energetic circulation seen in simulations of the Neoproterozoic snowball Earth. In addition, they suggest that given its simplicity, the model could be useful for estimating atmospheric kinetic energy and circulation on exoplanets. (AGU Advances, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026AV002593, 2026)

—Rebecca Dzombak, Science Writer

The logo for the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 13 is at left. To its right is the following text: The research reported here supports Sustainable Development Goal 13. AGU is committed to supporting the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which provides a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the future.
A photo of a telescope array appears in a circle over a field of blue along with the Eos logo and the following text: Support Eos’s mission to broadly share science news and research. Below the text is a darker blue button that reads “donate today.”
Citation: Dzombak, R. (2026), Wind works: The atmosphere’s invisible energetic tug-of-war, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260294. Published on 17 September 2026.
Text © 2026. AGU. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Source: Wind Works: The Atmosphere’s Invisible Energetic Tug-of-War