AI Insight
Researchers interviewed 14 neurosurgeons from 12 countries across different income levels to understand how digital health technologies could be integrated into traumatic brain injury care pathways. The study identified six key factors—Availability, Acceptability, Applicability, Capability, Feasibility, and Possibility—that form a new framework for designing and implementing digital health tools in TBI care. Significant disparities in technology access and use were found between urban and rural settings and across different income levels.
Why it matters
With 69 million people globally affected by TBI annually, care remains fragmented across complex pathways. This framework provides a practical tool for developers and policymakers to design digital health interventions that account for real-world constraints like infrastructure limitations, digital literacy, and cultural factors, potentially improving care delivery especially in resource-limited settings.
Understand the Science
⚠️ Preprint – Noch nicht peer-reviewed
Dieser Artikel wurde noch nicht von unabhängigen Experten begutachtet. Die Ergebnisse sind vorläufig und sollten mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.
Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects 69 million individuals globally each year, yet care remains fragmented across complex, multi-specialty pathways and settings. Digital health technologies offer potential to bridge care gaps, particularly in resource-limited settings, yet existing frameworks do not adequately address the complexities of the TBI care pathway or the diverse global contexts in which care occurs. Methods A cross-sectional qualitative study using critical realist-informed thematic analysis was conducted with practising neurosurgeons recruited internationally via National Institute for Health and Care Global Health Research Group on Acquired Brain and Spine Injury (NIHR ABSI) collaborating centres, social media, and society newsletters. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by a single researcher (OM) via Microsoft Teams (March-July 2024), exploring technology availability, healthcare infrastructure, clinical pathways, and contextual challenges, with a systems thinking approach guiding identification of current and potential technology integration points. Fourteen neurosurgeons from twelve countries participated, representing six lower-middle, two upper-middle, and four high-income countries. Results Six inductive themes emerged: Availability, Acceptability, Applicability, Capability, Feasibility, and Possibility- forming a novel conceptual framework visualised as a hexagonal chart for guiding digital health technology design and implementation in TBI care. Marked disparities in technology availability and utilisation were identified across urban/rural settings and income levels. Conclusions This framework offers a practical, context-sensitive tool for researchers, policymakers, and clinicians developing or implementing digital health technologies in TBI care globally. Visualisation in a similar style to a radar-chart enables simultaneous consideration of factors- including digital literacy, infrastructure, and cultural attitudes- whose neglect frequently underlies implementation failures.