AI Insight
This qualitative study of 15 clinical students at Makerere University in Uganda found that willingness to care for Ebola patients was conditional rather than absolute. While students expressed strong professional duty and desire to help, their participation was contingent on adequate preparation, reliable protective equipment, epidemic-specific training, supervision, and institutional support including insurance and compensation. Five themes emerged showing that perceived risks of infection, death, and transmitting disease to family members, combined with inadequate curriculum preparedness and welfare support, constrained their otherwise present willingness to participate in outbreak response.
Why it matters
The findings highlight critical gaps in medical education and outbreak preparedness that must be addressed to safely engage future healthcare workers during epidemic responses. Understanding these conditional factors can guide development of ethical, competency-based student roles in outbreak settings, with appropriate training, protection, and psychosocial support systems.
⚠️ Preprint – Noch nicht peer-reviewed
Dieser Artikel wurde noch nicht von unabhängigen Experten begutachtet. Die Ergebnisse sind vorläufig und sollten mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.
Introduction: Clinical students are a future health workforce, yet their roles during outbreaks of highly infectious diseases remain uncertain because of safety, training, supervision and welfare concerns. Ugandas 2022 outbreak of Ebola disease caused by Sudan ebolavirus highlighted the need to understand how clinical students perceive outbreak-related care. Aim: This study explored willingness to care for patients with Ebola virus disease among clinical students at a Ugandan medical school and examined how perceived risks, perceived benefits and support needs shaped that willingness. Methods: An exploratory descriptive qualitative study was conducted among clinical students of Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda. Fifteen undergraduate medical and nursing students in the later years of training were purposively selected. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, audio-recorded with consent, transcribed verbatim, de-identified and analysed using latent content analysis. The Health Belief Model sensitised interpretation, and reporting was strengthened using the COREQ guidance. Results: Five interrelated themes emerged, showing that willingness to care was conditional rather than simply present or absent. Students described an initial willingness grounded in professional duty, devotion to patients and the desire to save life. This willingness was restrained by perceived risks of contracting Ebola virus disease, dying, transmitting infection to family members or colleagues, emotional distress, lack of epidemic-readiness in the curriculum, inadequate preparedness and weak welfare support. Perceived benefits, including patient survival, professional learning, outbreak experience and personal fulfilment, strengthened willingness but did not override safety concerns. Students identified reliable personal protective equipment, epidemic-ready curricula, practical infection-prevention and control training, simulation, clear protocols, close supervision, psychosocial support, insurance and fair compensation as cues to action that could convert willingness into safe participation. Conclusions: Clinical students in this Ugandan teaching hospital expressed a strong sense of professional responsibility, but their willingness to participate in Ebola care was conditional upon preparedness, protection, epidemic-ready education and institutional trust. Professional duty and learning opportunities promoted participation, whereas perceived risks and inadequate support limited it. Medical education programmes and outbreak-response systems should develop ethical, supervised, competency-based student roles supported by practical curricula, reliable protective equipment and psychosocial and welfare safeguards.