Biology

We learn morality from others by adjusting how we value choices

AI Insight

This study investigated how observing dishonest behavior influences moral decision-making through social learning mechanisms. Using model-based fMRI and a cheating game, researchers found that participants increased their own cheating when exposed to dishonest social norms, with computational modeling revealing that learning about others' dishonesty dynamically biased participants' subjective valuation of cheating rather than changing their core moral preferences. Neural encoding of this valuation bias varied based on individual conformity levels and engaged the lateral prefrontal cortex, while simulation of others' cheating activated the posterior superior temporal sulcus.


Understanding the neural mechanisms of moral contagion has important implications for reducing dishonest behavior in organizational, educational, and social settings. The findings suggest that interventions targeting how people valuate dishonest acts, rather than trying to change fundamental moral preferences, may be more effective in preventing the spread of unethical behavior through social groups.


Understand the Science

Functional magnetic resonance imaging Concept coming soon Social learning Concept coming soon Moral development Concept coming soon

by Julien Benistant, Valentin Guigon, Alain Nicolas, Edmund Derrington, Jean-Claude Dreher

Observing immoral behavior increases one’s dishonesty by social influence and learning processes. The neurocomputational mechanisms underlying such moral contagion remain unclear. We tested different mechanistic hypotheses to account for moral contagion. We used model-based fMRI and a new cheating game in which participants were sequentially placed in honest and dishonest social norm contexts. Participants’ cheating behavior increased in the dishonest norm context but was unchanged in the honest one. The best model to account for behavior indicated that participants’ valuation was dynamically biased by learning that others had cheated. At the group level, this valuation bias was not encoded by any specific brain region. Instead, this neural signal depended on individual differences in conformity, and engaged the bilateral lateral prefrontal cortex. During learning, simulation of others’ cheating behavior was encoded in the posterior superior temporal sulcus. Together, these findings provide a mechanistic understanding of how learning about others’ dishonesty biases individuals’ valuation of cheating but does not alter one’s established preferences.

Source: Social learning dynamically shapes moral decision-making by biasing subjective valuation