AI Insight
This qualitative study examined the acceptability of a Community-Based Maternal and Newborn Care (CBMNC) program in South Sudan's Aweil East County, where 87% of births occur at home without skilled attendance. Using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability across 185 participants from multiple stakeholder groups, the study found high community acceptance driven by trust in locally selected Boma Health Workers, contextually adapted communication strategies, and perceived impact of commodity interventions such as misoprostol and chlorhexidine. However, provider burden, inadequate compensation, and concerns about long-term sustainability within a fragile health system represent significant unresolved challenges.
Why it matters
The findings highlight that community acceptability, while necessary, is insufficient on its own to ensure scalable and sustainable maternal and newborn health programs in low-resource, fragile settings. Policymakers and implementers must address structural issues including provider compensation and health system integration to translate community trust into lasting health outcomes.
⚠️ Preprint – Noch nicht peer-reviewed
Dieser Artikel wurde noch nicht von unabhängigen Experten begutachtet. Die Ergebnisse sind vorläufig und sollten mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.
South Sudan faces among the highest maternal and newborn mortality rates globally, with approximately 87% of deliveries occurring at home without skilled birth attendance. In 2024, the International Rescue Committee launched a Community-Based Maternal and Newborn Care (CBMNC) program in Aweil East County, Northern Bahr El Ghazal, deploying trained Boma Health Workers (BHWs) to deliver essential maternal and newborn health services at the household level. This study explored the acceptability of the CBMNC model among diverse stakeholders. This qualitative descriptive study was grounded in the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Data were collected between May and July 2025 through 17 focus group discussions (FGDs), 14 in-depth interviews (IDIs), and 10 key informant interviews (KIIs) with 185 participants, including program recipients, male partners, mothers and mothers-in-law, Boma and Hospital Health Committee (BHC/HHC) members, BHWs, supervisors, and health system stakeholders at state and national levels. Framework analysis, combining deductive coding based on the seven TFA constructs with inductive thematic analysis, was used. CBMNC was well accepted by recipients and their families, despite provider and health system concerns about sustainability. Trust in community-selected BHWs made home-based care valuable, especially given limited facility access. Intervention coherence relied on pictorial aids, repeated visits, and peer learning to address low literacy. Participants perceived commodity interventions like misoprostol and chlorhexidine as impactful, while behavioral counseling was less recognized. Clients faced minimal burden, but providers experienced significant challenges and inadequate compensation. Health stakeholders were cautiously optimistic but questioned lay provider capacity and long-term viability in a fragile environment. CBMNC can achieve high community acceptability when delivered through trusted, community-selected health workers using contextually appropriate strategies. However, community acceptability alone is insufficient for sustainable scale-up. Addressing provider compensation, workload, and structural integration into national health systems is essential to ensure that gains in acceptability translate into sustained service delivery.