AI Insight
A study of 3,240 HIV-positive individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy in Zambia and South Africa found that 17% did not disclose their HIV-positive status when self-reporting, despite biomarker evidence confirming they were on treatment. Non-disclosure was significantly more common among younger people (ages 18-24), men, those formally employed, and individuals reporting condomless sex. Viral suppression rates were high (93.7%) and similar regardless of disclosure status, indicating these individuals were successfully treated but invisible to surveillance systems relying on self-reported data.
Why it matters
This discordance between biological evidence and self-reported HIV status undermines the accuracy of HIV surveillance and program evaluations that depend on self-reported data. The findings suggest that current methods may significantly underestimate treatment coverage and highlight the need for objective biomarker measures and interventions addressing social barriers to disclosure in HIV monitoring systems.
Understand the Science
⚠️ Preprint – Noch nicht peer-reviewed
Dieser Artikel wurde noch nicht von unabhängigen Experten begutachtet. Die Ergebnisse sind vorläufig und sollten mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.
Background: Misclassification of HIV status in population-based surveys remains a critical barrier to accurate surveillance and program evaluation. Self-reported HIV status may diverge from objective measures, particularly among individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). We used biomarker-confirmed antiretroviral (ARV) drug detection to assess the prevalence and correlates of discordance between self-reported HIV status and biologic evidence of HIV treatment among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Zambia and South Africa. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the HPTN 071 (PopART) cluster-randomized trial. At the 24-month survey visit, participants underwent HIV testing and laboratory assessment for ARV drugs in plasma. We defined discordant self-report (hereafter "non-disclosure") as reporting HIV-negative or unknown status among individuals with ARV drugs detected. We estimated the prevalence of non-disclosure, compared prevalence by study arm, and used modified Poisson regression to identify associated factors. We also examined whether non-disclosure was associated with viral suppression (<400 copies/mL). Results: Among 3,240 PLHIV with ARV drugs detected, 552 (17.0%) did not report an HIV-positive status–indicating that nearly one in six individuals on ART were misclassified by self-report. Non-disclosure did not differ between intervention and control arms (adjusted relative risk [aRR]: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.67-1.58). Non-disclosure was more common among younger individuals (age 18-24 years: aRR 2.30; 95% CI: 1.66-3.19), men (aRR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.07-1.79), and those in formal employment (aRR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.06-1.90). Individuals reporting condomless sex at last encounter were also more likely not to disclose (aRR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.31-1.92). Viral suppression was high overall (93.7%) and did not differ by disclosure status (aRR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.74-1.52). Conclusion: A substantial proportion of PLHIV receiving ART did not report a known HIV-positive status, highlighting important discordance between biomarker evidence and self-reported data. Despite high levels of viral suppression, these individuals remain "hidden" from routine surveillance, with implications for estimating HIV diagnosis and treatment coverage. Strategies that incorporate objective measures alongside self-report, and that address social and structural barriers to disclosure, are essential to improve the accuracy of HIV surveillance and guide effective public health responses.