Psychology

Pro-environmental behavioral intention in university energy-saving contexts: extending the Value–Belief–Norm framework with institutional support

AI Insight

A structural equation modeling study of 864 university students across 81 institutions in Shanxi Province, China, found that personal norms were the strongest direct predictor of pro-environmental behavioral intention, consistent with the Value-Belief-Norm framework. Sustainability-oriented education demonstrated significant direct and indirect effects on environmental values, beliefs, personal norms, and behavioral intentions, while university leadership showed no significant direct effect on behavioral intention or personal norms. Environmental values and beliefs also retained independent direct effects on behavioral intention, suggesting multiple psychological pathways are at work simultaneously.


These findings suggest that higher education institutions seeking to promote energy-saving behaviors among students should prioritize structured, knowledge-based sustainability education over top-down institutional authority, as educational interventions more reliably activate the psychological mechanisms that drive behavioral change.


ObjectiveWith increasing energy demands across the globe and increased focus in sustainable development agenda, higher education institutions (HEIs) are relevant in developing energy-saving cognitions and attitudes of students.PurposeThis paper will examine how university leadership, sustainability-oriented education, environmental values, environmental beliefs, and personal norms influence and affect the pro-environmental behavioral intention (PEBI) of HEIs students.MethodsA group of 864 students of 81 HEIs located in the Shanxi Province took part in a survey and were recruited through a multi-stage stratified sampling design. The data analysis was done using structural equation modeling (SEM).ResultsFirst, sustainability-oriented education exhibits effective and multidimensional impacts which directly and indirectly impact the environmental values, environmental beliefs, personal norms, and behavioral intentions. Contrastingly, the university leadership (UL) has no direct impact on PEBI and does not trigger the personal norms in the students. Second, the Value–Belief–Norm (VBN) sequence was supported, and personal norms emerged as the strongest direct predictor of PEBI. However, environmental values and environmental beliefs also retained significant direct effects on PEBI. Third, sustainability-oriented education translates into PEBI through significant indirect pathways via environmental values and environmental beliefs, whereas the corresponding indirect effects of university leadership through these psychological mediators are weak or non-significant. Fourth, the integrated model demonstrates strong explanatory power, but this explanatory power is primarily driven by education and the VBN psychological chain rather than by university leadership.ImplicationsThe research reveals that effective HEIs interventions should combine direct, knowledge-based educational strategies with leadership actions designed to support and enable student-driven change, rather than attempting to directly command behavioral change through institutional authority.

Source: Pro-environmental behavioral intention in university energy-saving contexts: extending the Value–Belief–Norm framework with institutional support