AI Insight
This study investigated whether people with aphasia retain the ability to perceive sound-shape correspondences (the tendency to associate certain speech sounds with rounded or pointed shapes, known as the bouba-kiki effect). Eleven participants with aphasia rated auditory pseudowords on a rounded-to-pointed scale, and their responses were significantly correlated with both reference ratings and those of neurologically intact controls. However, the results also indicated that greater language impairment — particularly deficits in phonological segmentation and semantic processing — was associated with reduced sensitivity to this form of iconicity.
Why it matters
Understanding how iconicity processing is preserved or disrupted in aphasia could inform speech-language therapy, potentially supporting approaches that leverage sound-meaning mappings as a rehabilitation tool for individuals with language impairments.
⚠️ Preprint – Noch nicht peer-reviewed
Dieser Artikel wurde noch nicht von unabhängigen Experten begutachtet. Die Ergebnisse sind vorläufig und sollten mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.
Purpose: To examine speech iconicity for shape in aphasia, we compared iconicity ratings from people with aphasia to those from neurologically intact individuals and evaluated how iconicity relates to phonological and semantic processing profiles in aphasia. Method: Eleven people with aphasia and 11 age- and gender-matched neurologically intact participants rated how rounded or pointed 50 auditory pseudowords sounded using a 5 point scale. Ratings from participants with aphasia were compared to predicted iconicity ratings derived from reference ratings from prior work and to ratings from neurologically intact participants. For each participant with aphasia, correlations between individual ratings and predicted ratings were related to measures of phonological and semantic processing. Results: Ratings from people with aphasia were significantly correlated with both the predicted ratings and the ratings from neurologically intact participants. The strength of the correlation between individual ratings and predicted ratings did not differ significantly between groups, although there was a trend toward weaker correlations in the aphasia group. There were indications that greater language impairment was associated with greater disruption of iconicity ratings; in particular, deficits in phonological segmentation and semantic processing were associated with reduced sensitivity to shape iconicity. Conclusion: These findings suggest that sensitivity to shape iconicity is preserved in individuals with aphasia to varying degrees. The specific nature of language impairment appears to play an important role in determining iconicity processing in aphasia.